Jotted Lines

A Collection Of Essays

Menu
  • Literature
  • Media Studies
  • History
  • Management
  • Philosophy
  • Economics
  • Gender Studies
  • Psychology
  • Law
Menu

Have power and ideology been used to achieve consensus in India?

Posted on May 20, 2014 by JL Admin

“After the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) took full control over the Indian government in 1998, some Indian states signed new laws against Christians, banning conversion activities. Hindu nationalist groups continue attacks against India’s Christians and its Muslim minority, which still numbers close to 150 million in a country of one billion.  BJP leaders have been present during violent episodes, and the party maintains close ties to groups identified by human rights advocates as instigators and perpetrators of ethnic violence. Even the basis on which the party was elected in 1998 is considered inflammatory by some, with the premise of building a temple on the ruins of a mosque demolished by Hindu nationalists.” (Din, 2005, p.22)

The electoral successes of the BJP during the late 1990s suggest that right-wing ideology still has currency in Indian polity.  While ideology and power continue to be exercised in India to create popular consensus, the deceptions and dangers they usually encompass is not understood by a majority of the population.

References

Bhatt, C. (2001). Hindu Nationalism : Origins, Ideologies, and Modern Myths /. New York: Berg.

Charlton, S. E. (1997). Comparing Asian Politics: India, China, and Japan. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Chhibber, P. (2002). Why Are Some Women Political Active? the Household, Public Space and Political Participation in India. 409+.

Cohen, S. P. (2000, Summer). India Rising. The Wilson Quarterly, 24, 32.

Din, S. (2005, Spring). Saffron Dollars. Colorlines, 8, 22+.

Gooptu, N. (2001). The Politics of the Urban Poor in Early Twentieth-Century India. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Jayal, N. G. (2008, Spring). Left Behind? Women, Politics and Development in India. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 14, 91+.

Kaviraj, S. (2000). Modernity and Politics in India. Daedalus, 129(1), 137.

Khanna, P., & Mohan, C. R. (2006). Getting India Right. Policy Review, (135), 43+.

Raman, A. (2000, March). Politics in India. Contemporary Review, 276, 135.

Roy, T., & Borowiak, C. (2003). Against Ecofeminism: Agrarian Populism and the Splintered Subject in Rural India. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 28(1), 57+.

Sardar, Z. (2006, January 30). Haunted by the Politics of Hate: Behind the Prosperous Facade Lurks an Ugly Strain of Hindu Fundamentalism, Argues Ziauddin Sardar. New Statesman, 135, 30+.

Related Posts:

  • The American and British political systems in comparison
  • How is American foreign policy made and implemented?
  • A vignette on the Turkish Political System
  • The arguments for and against Britain adopting a form of Proportional Representation for…
  • Hauss and Dahl’s definition of democracy vis-à-vis 'American exceptionalism'
  • Summary of The Populist Addiction by David Brooks
Pages: 1 2 3
©2025 Jotted Lines | Built using WordPress and Responsive Blogily theme by Superb