How does Plato’s theory of the psyche relate to modern management practice?

Executive Summary: Plato’s speculations and assertions on the nature of human psyche have withstood the test of time and are a useful aid to modern managers. Plato defined the abstract and the rational as equivalent to the moral good. He equated self-knowledge with self-restraint, and proclaimed that knowledge is virtue. According to Plato, the psyche is not made of substance and it is immortal. Plato divided human psyche into three components – the rational, affective and appetitive. Plato understood that the human psyche is in constant exchange with the external social, cultural and political environment. The similarities between Plato’s and Freud’s conceptions of the psyche are relevant to modern business management because Freudian psychoanalysis is well entrenched in Human Resources Management practice. The continued utility of Plato’s theory of the psyche to modern managers is illustrated by its perusal in management seminars and workshops. Even the process of knowledge creation and transfer prevalent in management practice today has parallels to Plato’s ideas on knowledge. Plato’s theory of psyche remains an eminent source of wisdom and counsel to leaders in various fields today. Introduction: Plato is one of the most influential philosophers from the Hellenistic Age, whose ideas are still relevant to modern times. Business management as we know it today was not a preoccupation of Plato. For that matter, management of business enterprises under a capitalist framework is a modern phenomenon ushered in by the Industrial Revolution of late 18th century. But Plato was a polymath, who forwarded treatises on a range of subjects. Questions of what constitutes good governance under a monarch was a focus of his thought. When we look closely, there are many parallels between the structure of a kingdom and that of a business corporation. Both are more or less authoritarian institutions with a top-down power hierarchy. With the net worth of many Fortune 500 corporations is equivalent to the GDP of some nations, corporate houses are rightly referred to as ‘empires’ in management literature. Hence, although the thoughts of Plato and that of Peter Drucker are separated by two millennia, the former can be seen as a management guru in his own right. In particular, Plato’s speculations and assertions on the nature of human psyche have withstood the test of time and are a useful aid to modern managers. This essay will flesh out this thesis in detail. Body of Essay: It is fair to state that of all ancient Greek philosophers, it was Plato, who defined and characterized the nature of the psyche in great detail. Plato was the one who “defined the abstract and the rational as equivalent to the moral good. He equated self-knowledge with self-restraint, and proclaimed that knowledge is virtue.... Lack of knowledge and the irrational, were equated with moral evil, and then, with madness.” (Buckley, 2001, p. 452) For Plato, the ‘soma’ makes up the physical body, while the psyche is the what animates a body and gives it life. Psyche is what distinguishes a living creature from a dead one. The body, on the other hand, plays host to the psyche and can either restrict or extend the expression of psyche. According to Plato, the psyche is not made of substance and it is immortal. Plato divided human psyche into three components – the rational, affective and appetitive. In simple terms, examples of appetites or desires are thirst, hunger, etc. The ability to overcome the appetites is the function of the rational. And the appetitive, also called the Spirit is the moral compass as attuned by social norms. He defined conflict as a “struggle between the rational and the appetitive portions with each trying to enlist the affective portion on its side." (Buckley, 2001, p.453) For example, conflicts could arise in simple situation like these: I know it is wrong to lie, but can’t help myself in certain situations; I know it is morally corrupt to covet other men’s wives but I still end up looking at them lustfully; etc. It is a testimony to the amazing imagination and intellect of the great ancient philosopher that an analogous tripartite view of the mind was formulated by Sigmund Freud two millennia later. Plato’s three divisions of the psyche is similar to Freud’s structural model of ego, id and superego. “Thus we have an early tripartite view of the mind that echoes Freud's later structural model of ego, id, and superego. Plato saw mental illness as a consequence of an imbalance whereby the unbridled instinctual part gains the upper hand. Treatment is through the Platonic dialogue, a precursor of the psychoanalytic dialogue that brings the conflicting parts of the mind into harmony and reasserts control over the irrational part of the psyche. The philosophical dialogue, however, differs radically from the psychoanalytic dialogue, by attempting to discard the emotions, whereas in the analytic dialogue emotions are at the center of the treatment.” (Buckley, 2001, p.454) The similarities between Plato’s and Freud’s conceptions of the psyche are relevant to modern business management. This is so because Freudian psychoanalysis is well entrenched in Human Resources Management practice. Employee counseling, employee motivation, etc, draw heavily from modern psychology, especially Freud. And the Public Relations industry, in particular, is almost solely based on theory and practice of modern psychoanalysis. For example, contemporary consumer culture works by attracting customers with ego-stroking advertisement messages and by creating an illusory sense of security. This is nothing but adapting and exploiting theories of the psyche for commercial gain. (Russell, 2005, p.56) Plato understood that the human psyche is in constant exchange with the external social, cultural and political environment and these are “fundamentally shaped by the movement of meanings from polis to psyche and back again”. (Plato, 1957, p.41) The ecosystem of the business corporation has its own social, cultural and political content, thus enabling an application of Plato’s theory of the psyche to it. Plato works out one of the most insightful accounts of psychosocial degeneration ever formulated. Contemporary object-relations theorists, if they revisit the works of Plato, will find concurrence with his account of psychopathology. For Plato, the influence of polis on psyche and vice versa is largely unconscious. (Stevenson, 1987) According to him, most of human experience is illusory. In the classic Parable of the Cave narrated by Plato, “we are, unbeknownst to ourselves, strapped to a wall and forced to watch the projections of images onto the opposite wall which we mistake not only for reality, but for ourselves. We are, on this account, strangers to ourselves. But for Plato, there is therapeutic potential in pushing hard at contradictions inherent in the illusions themselves. Every image is a shadow, a distortion of something bearing more reality than it. In focusing on the distortion we can painfully and slowly work our way toward what the distortion is a distortion of. Once again Plato plants the hope of avoiding despair. (Buckley, 2001, p.459) The continued utility of Plato’s theory of the psyche to modern managers is illustrated by its perusal in management seminars and workshops. The one-week seminar conducted by North American Publishing Company is a good example. Titled ‘Plato arrives at publishing firm’, the seminar was run by John Wyatt, a professor of classics at the University of Chicago. For this event, more than 50 executives from the publishing industry, including editors and promoters attended hour-and-half long sessions that are steeped in content from Plato’s Protagoras and Aristotle’s Poetics. It might seem odd that Protagoras is allied with contemporary management issues in the publishing industry. But the organizers of the event firmly believed that “the classics would benefit, even inspire, editors and promotional copywriters.” ("Plato Arrives at Publishing," 1997, p.25) Seminars of this sort are by no means an exception, as similar events are organized across the year. For example, seminars about ancient Greek philosophers’ views on the art and scope of writing and deductive logic are being held. Even matters of corporate social responsibility and partnership with local community are being discussed. Similar to how pupils at Athenian libraries would have debated and discussed, attendees of modern management seminars are also discussing “clarity and immediacy in communication, the notion of a sublime piece of work, and purpose and meaning in human activity...The seminars also proved that ivory-tower concepts can find hard-nosed applications in the business world.” ("Plato Arrives at Publishing," 1997, p.26) Since the beginning of the industrial revolution, the advancement in technology has accelerated the process of automation. Today, the manufacturing sector is quite small compared to the services sector. The pool of knowledge workers, aided by Information Technology are growing at a rapid pace. And here too, we find the theories of Plato quite useful. To illustrate, “For more than two millennia, trying to understand the nature of knowledge has been the key of philosophers and scientists. Seven key groupings can be seen. The discussions on knowledge start with the work of Plato and Aristotle. Plato, in the Theaetetus, one of his Socratic dialogues (Plato, 369BC) tries to answer the question "What is knowledge?" He proposes three key concepts: "Knowledge is perception"; "Knowledge is true belief"; and "Knowledge is true belief with an account". (Grant & Grant, 2008, p.573) Conclusion: Hence, in conclusion, it is fairly clear that Plato’s theory of the psyche has withstood the test of time. Even after two and half millennia of its first articulation it remains an eminent source of wisdom and counsel to leaders in various fields. Business corporations, which are the most visible symbols and dominant institutions of current times, can greatly benefit by heeding to Plato’s thoughts, especially those related to his theory of the psyche. (Lynch & Cruise, 2006, p.12) Even the process of knowledge creation and transfer prevalent in management practice today has parallels to Plato’s ideas on knowledge. For example, the three stage evolution from apprentice to journeyman to master propounded by Plato is very similar to how an apprentice graduates through skill levels in the workplace. This model holds true for both cognitive and practical skills. (Grant & Grant, 2008, p.575) Further, the parallels between Plato’s tripartite view of human psyche and Freud’s conception of the mind is testimony to the former’s veracity and importance. While a discussion of Plato in modern corporate lounges might see out of place, it is the right approach to solving key management issues. References Buckley, P. (2001). Ancient Templates: The Classical Origins of Psychoanalysis. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 55(4), p. 451-460 Grant, K. A., & Grant, C. T. (2008). Developing a Model of Next Generation Knowledge Management. Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology, 5, p. 571-576 Lynch, Thomas and Cruise, Peter. (2006). Handbook of Organization Theory and Management, The Philosophical Approach, Second Edition, Published by Francis & Taylor. Stevenson, Leslie. (1987). Seven Theories of Human Nature, Second Edition, Oxford University Press. p. 71 – 84. Management, Philosophy and Performance – PowerPoint Presentation, MGT210, Platonism: Leading from the Psyche. Plato. (1957). Plato's Theory of Knowledge: The Theaetetus and the Sophist of Plato (F. M. Cornford, Trans.). New York: Liberal Arts Press. Plato. (1961). The Collected Dialogues of Plato, Including the Letters (E. Hamilton & H. Cairns, Eds.). New York: Pantheon books. Plato Arrives at Publishing Firm; Classics Professor Shares Greek Ideals on Critical Thinking and Creativity with Business Editors. (1997, October). Folio: The Magazine for Magazine Management, 16, p. 25-26. Russell, D. (2005). Plato on Pleasure and the Good Life. Oxford, England:

Related Posts: