When we look at Ken Loach’s films since Kes, we find direct and pronounced engagement with the neo-liberal theme. In this sense, Kes can be grouped together with these later films although it preceded the actual implementation of neoliberal policies. Loach’s films since the 1990s contain bold pronouncements against the evils of such economic policies. The films of this period have
“repeatedly come back to the ravages of and struggles against the ruling class offensive known as neo-liberalism. The attack on working people’s living standards, wages and unions, the relentless erosion of the social, health and educational provisions of the so-called welfare state, the polarization of rich and poor, the familiar mantras of privatization, deregulation, free market magic are all too well known… it is now generalized as blatantly imperialist globalization, borne by the World Bank, the IMF and American military might.” (Forsyth, 2003)
Seen in this light, Kes is a precursor, an eerie harbinger, for some of these negative consequences of globalization. For, Kes deals with issues of increasing poverty, delinquency, public schooling standards, individual alienation, decline of the institution of family, rampant commercialization, etc. For its treatment of these neoliberal themes, Kes is a critique of this economic system, even if it is attributed retrospectively.
In terms of technique one could see refreshing cinematography in Kes. Considering that the 60’s gave birth to the Nouvelle Vague (of the French New Wave) of cinema, one could see its influence in Loach’s approach and style. In a marked deviation from films of an early era, the visual capabilities of the medium are explored to the full. Dialogue is used minimally, while ambient sound is used as a signifier of feeling, emotion or an event. Despite the visual beauty of the film, that was not how Ken Loach conceived it to be. Consistent with the dark social themes in the film Loach wanted it picturized in black and white. But citing commercial appeal of black and white in the late 1960s Loach had to abandon this plan. It might have been a blessing in disguise, for the beautiful country landscapes of the film’s setting add irony to the personal outcomes in the plot. The final tragedy of the death of the Kestrel is made more poignant by all the beautiful visualization of the bird and its habitat that had preceded it.
Finally, the social concerns raised by Kes are relevant even today. This is learnt from the fact that the film’s echoes are evident in numerous subsequent British films, including Lynne Ramsay’s Ratcatcher, Shane Meadows’ A Room For Romeo Brass and Robert Bangura’s The Girl With Brains In Her Feet. All these works evoke “working-class childhoods in a lyrical but unsentimental way which would have been unthinkable without Loach’s example.” (“Touching Take on a,” 2009) Loach’s films in general and Kes in particular have powerfully addressed
“the politics and betrayals of unions, strikes and revolutions, the painful daily struggles with family, sexuality, race, housing, poverty, drugs and alcohol, the contradictions and inhumanity of the welfare state, the solidarity and oppression of the workplace; every aspect of working class life interests his humane realism. Loach’s is a cinema of emotion and analysis, sometimes didactic, always partisan. But victories are few and far between, triumphs often solely of working class spirit against overwhelming odds.” (Vallely, 2002)
Forsyth, S. (2003). Making and Remaking Class in Ken Loach’s Recent Films. CineAction, (61), 66+.
Shail, R. (2007). British Film Directors: A Critical Guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Touching Take on a Classic; Review. (2009, November 4). The Birmingham Post (England).
Vallely, P. (2002, February 16). Kes the Real-Life Sequel ; `What Happened to Billy at the End of Kes?’ Is One of the Commonest Questions Asked by Readers of Barry Hines’s Classic Novel. the True Story of Ed Seager Provides an Answer Stranger Than Any Fiction. by Paul Vallely. The Independent (London, England).